Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Shanghai Rolex Masters: Arthur Gea v Ugo Humbert
“Shanghai Rolex Masters: Arthur Gea vs Ugo Humbert I’m picking Arthur Gea here at 53¢. Gea has looked more consistent during the Asian swing, winning three matches in Beijing and coming back from a set down to beat Faria in Shanghai. Humbert has more experience, but his recent hard-court form has been inconsistent, with 6 losses in his last 8 matches. I think Gea can take advantage of Humbert's second serve and current lack of consistency. It should be close, but I like Gea to get the win. https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1152116 #nfa”
Verification details
- Message id
1557918863994265601open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1152116jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Shanghai Rolex Masters: Arthur Gea vs Ugo Humbert"; entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1152116 "Shanghai Rolex Masters: Arthur Gea vs Ugo Humbert" outcome "Arthur Gea" price 0.9915 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#4693), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Arthur Gea @ 53¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement