Showing American football calls only: 3 counted. The weekly cap and qualification are judged on the whole season; a combo shows here when all its legs are American football. Form covers every call.
ProfitiEvery call risks 1 unit. A win at 40¢ pays +1.5 units, a loss is -1. This is the running total; a call closed early counts what it actually realized.
-1.81u
units · 3 priced calls
ROIiAverage profit per call, as a percent of the 1-unit stake. Staying positive over many calls is the skill signal; win rate alone is not. Beats the odds (3 calls): hit rate minus the hit rate the entry prices implied. Zero means the caller wins exactly as often as the market expected.
-60.3%
per call · vs odds needs 5 calls
RecordiWins and losses over graded calls. The sample size is always shown: a win rate only means something alongside it. The lower number is the 95% confidence floor on the win rate given the sample. It rises as the sample grows.
1–2
33% of 3 (at least 6%)
FormiMost recent graded calls, newest on the right. It reads the whole record, whatever the season, period or filter.
LWWWL
L1 streak
Sport
Record
Units
ROI
Graded
American football3
1–2
-1.81u
-60.3%
3
Season American football equity curve
3 graded
Cumulative units over graded calls (flat 1u stake, a step per call; pending calls never move the curve).
“NFL: Lions vs Panthers (Wk 4) Reasoning: Lions talent and passing-efficiency edge drive the road favorite; Panthers home but limited by new play-caller and tackle turnover. Identity confirmed: Detroit at Carolina, Wk 4, Bank of America. Supplied 0-0 records conflict with Wk 4 and availability notes (Lions OT win vs Saints; Panthers loss to Bears); researched blocks are pre-Wk 1 stale. Seeds unkno…”
“NFL: Patriots vs Bills (Wk 4) Reasoning: Bills home field and stronger recent program tier outweigh road Patriots after Maye’s three-INT Week 1 collapse and thin depth. Buffalo’s full Brady-Leonhard regime change plus zero 2026 games played add real uncertainty. Identity confirmed: Patriots at Bills, Highmark, Wk4 AFC East. Bills seed unknown; records 0-1/0-0 conflict with Week 4—researched form …”
“NFL: Dolphins vs Vikings (Wk 4) Reasoning: Dolphins are a Hafley-led rebuild with the league's youngest roster and Malik Willis at QB, plus LB Louis out and Harrison questionable—a thin, unscouted team opening a new era. Vikings are home at U.S. Bank with a more established roster; Murray is listed Questionable (concussion protocol) but researched context says he cleared and Wentz went 2-0 in rel…”
“NFL: Falcons vs Packers (Wk 3) Reasoning: Identity confirmed: Falcons (NFC South) at Packers (NFC North), Thursday night at Lambeau. Decisive for Green Bay: home field, healthier roster, established Love offense despite missing Jacobs and Parsons (PUP). Decisive for Atlanta: Penix making his first 2026 start off a torn ACL, on the road on a short week, with a depleted edge rush—raises variance a…”
“NFL: Titans vs Giants (Wk 3) Reasoning: Giants (home, ~1-1) look the more complete team; Singletary and a functional passing game powered a Week 1 win, and they've been solid against the spread. Titans (0-2) nearly upset the Eagles behind Cam Ward, showing the rebuild is ahead of schedule, but they remain thin on talent and lost close. Sportsbooks (+220/+225, FPI 31%, Dimers 28%) all price Tennes…”
“NFL: Chiefs vs Dolphins (Wk 3) Reasoning: Chiefs are 2-0 with the NFL's top offense (457.5 ypg, 32 ppg), while Miami sits 0-2, 29th in scoring and 27th in yards. Kansas City's key concern is LT Josh Simmons, reportedly week-to-week with a back injury and likely out again, thinning pass protection. Miami's factor is a stagnant offense under Hafley that hasn't produced points; the defense also has …”
“NFL: Seahawks vs Commanders (Wk 3) Reasoning: Seattle's biggest edge is quarterback play: even with Darnold doubtful, Drew Lock has been excellent (422 yards, 4 TDs, 0 INTs) and the defense leads the NFL in interceptions and turnover differential. Washington's key factor is the loss of star QB Jayden Daniels to a dislocated elbow; Marcus Mariota starts and was serviceable but unspectacular in rel…”
“NFL: Giants vs Rams (Wk 2) Reasoning: Rams (0-1) were blown out 27-7 by the 49ers in Week 1 and now lose star edge Myles Garrett to IR, gutting their pass rush. Still, they're home at SoFi and more talented top-to-bottom, with Stafford due to bounce back. Giants (1-0) surprised the Cowboys 28-20 behind three Jaxson Dart TDs and a healthy Malik Nabers, so New York arrives with momentum. I nudge th…”
“College Football: Penn vs Bucknell Reasoning: Penn (ranked #18) is far stronger statistically: 45.0 PPG and 487 total yards/game with balanced pass (324) and rush (163) attacks and 50% third-down rate. Bucknell scores just 15.0 PPG on 243 total yards and a poor 25% third-down rate. Historically Penn beat Bucknell 31-21 in their prior meeting. The market's 61% and very wide 44pp spread badly under…”
“NFL: Lions vs Bills (Wk 2) Reasoning: Identity confirmed: Detroit Lions (NFC North) at Buffalo Bills (AFC East), Wk 2 interconference at Highmark, Bills home. Records show 0-0 carryover but availability notes reference a Week 1 Lions OT win over the Saints, confirming this is Week 2. Decisive for Buffalo: Josh Allen, home-field, and a top offense (added DJ Moore) outweigh a rebuilt young defense.…”
“NFL: Dolphins vs Raiders (Wk 1) Reasoning: Identity confirmed: Miami Dolphins (AFC East) at Las Vegas Raiders (AFC West), Week 1 interconference-style opener at Allegiant. No 2026 form exists; both are rebuilds with new HCs (Hafley/Kubiak) and new QBs (Willis vs veteran Cousins). Decisive for Raiders: home field plus Cousins' experience edge over Willis, despite losing TE Bowers (Out, meniscus). …”
“NFL: Cardinals vs Chargers (Wk 1) Reasoning: The Chargers' decisive factor is Justin Herbert operating behind returning elite tackles Rashawn Slater and Joe Alt against a retooling defense, giving Los Angeles a massive offensive edge. Arizona's decisive factor is whether their revamped passing attack can exploit a questionable Chargers secondary despite losing James Conner to IR. Identities are c…”
“NFL: 49ers vs Rams (Wk 1) Reasoning: The Rams' pass rush headlined by Myles Garrett against a retooling 49ers line is decisive for Los Angeles, while Christian McCaffrey establishing early rhythm against an interior lacking Aaron Donald is pivotal for San Francisco. Identity is confirmed for both NFC West franchises at the neutral Melbourne venue. Playoff seeds were missing as expected for Week 1…”
“College Football: Memphis vs Boise State (Week 2) Reasoning: Boise State hosts, coming off a competitive Week 1 loss at No. 2 Oregon where Madsen threw three TDs; strong Mountain West program with home-field edge. Memphis is 2-0 with gaudy rushing (265 ypg) and 34.5 ppg, but that came versus weak Georgia State and UNLV, inflating its numbers against a tougher road test. Boise's supplied stats loo…”
“College Football: Houston vs Texas Tech (Week 3) Reasoning: Texas Tech's edge is its higher ranking (12 vs 23) plus home-field in Lubbock; Houston counters with an efficient dual-threat offense (305 pass, 228 rush, 53.85% third down) that keeps it live. Both average 33 PPG, so scoring is comparable, but Tech's better third-down/turnover discipline and site advantage tilt it. Identity confirmed: b…”
“College Football: Alabama vs Kentucky (Week 2) Reasoning: Alabama's edge is elite offensive firepower (48.0 PPG, 53% third downs) and superior roster talent; only concern is a road SEC environment and shaky recent postseason form. Kentucky's strength is passing volume (301 YPG), but 37.5% third-down rate and weak run defense suggest that output came against soft competition. Alabama's talent gap …”
“College Football: Louisville vs Ole Miss (Week 1) Reasoning: Ole Miss's decisive edge is a far more explosive offense (38.9 ppg, 313 pass ypg) plus a higher-tier SEC roster and playmaking defense (974 tackles, 83 TFL). Louisville's counter is a balanced run game (163.9 rush ypg) and a positive turnover margin (+3 vs +1), which can keep a neutral-site game close but not tilt it. Identity confirmed…”
“College Football: Webber International vs Stetson Reasoning: Both models strongly agree that Stetson's FCS status gives them a decisive athletic and depth advantage over NAIA Webber International, despite Stetson playing in the non-scholarship Pioneer League. Predictions align closely between 25% and 28% win probability for Webber, matching market consensus around 27.5%. While Pioneer League team…”
